Legal Opinion

City of Cedar Rapids v. Cox

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 7, 1961No. 50188PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnell, J.

Plaintiff, City of Cedar Rapids, brought this action in district court pursuant to section 362.26 of the Code for annexation of between 12 and 13 square miles of unincorporated territory adjacent to the city. The trial court denied annexation and the city appealed. A cross-appeal by defendants tenders jurisdictional and constitutional questions.

I. The facts are not in material dispute. The dispute involves the premise from which the facts should be considered and of course the conclusions to be drawn therefrom.

Although subsequently repeated, we deem it appropriate to say in the beginning that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Rogers v. BurlingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  3. State Ex Rel. Klise v. Town of RiverdaleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  4. City of Cedar Rapids v. CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  5. City of Des Moines v. LampartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. Latham & YorkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  2. City of Clinton v. Owners of the Property Situated Within Certain Described BoundariesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  3. James Patrick Ryan v. Harry C. Tinsley, Warden of Colorado State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  4. City of Iowa City v. Muscatine Development Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  5. City of Monticello v. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API