Legal Opinion

City of Cedar Rapids v. Cox

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 18, 1958No. 49413PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, C. J.

Plaintiff, City of Cedar Bapids, filed its petition in equity in the district court pursuant to section 362.26(4), Code, 1954, for a decree annexing about 13 square miles of unincorporated adjacent territory to the city. About 100 defendants, Boger L. Anderson et al., filed special appearance alleging they were not served with sufficient original notice of the suit in that it was served by publication pursuant to Code section 362.27 and this statute is unconstitutional as. a denial of due process guaranteed by the 14th amendment to the Federal Constitution and Article I, section 9, Iowa…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Sergeant v. Watson Bros. Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  4. In Re Estate of PierceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  5. City of Tucson v. GarrettArizona Supreme Court · 1954

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Millsap v. Cedar Rapids Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  2. Williams v. County of BuffaloNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Lucas v. Pioneer, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  4. City of Cedar Rapids v. CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  5. Ditch v. HessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API