City of Monticello v. Adams
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
UHLENHOPP, Justice.
In this appeal we must decide whether the trial court rightly decreed annexation of territory by the City of Monticello, Iowa.
Heretofore, Monticello had 852 acres within the city limits and owned 95 acres outside the limits which were used for municipal purposes. When the annexation proceedings were commenced, Monticello’s population was 3,509, an increase of 10% during the previous decennium. Annexation of contiguous territory appeared advisable to permit orderly future development, and a professional planning firm was employed. After a study, the firm recommended…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Morford v. UngerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
- Manilla Community School District v. HalversonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- City of Cedar Rapids v. CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
- City of Cedar Rapids v. CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Turner v. LimbrechtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- Hysell v. Iowa Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Moose v. RichSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- McKinley v. Waterloo RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- City of Muscatine v. WatersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.