Legal Opinion

James Patrick Ryan v. Harry C. Tinsley, Warden of Colorado State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 9, 1963No. 7219_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Ryan is a persistent petitioner for habeas corpus to obtain relief from a Colorado state court conviction. 1 He now asserts that for many years the districting of the State of Colorado for the election of members of both houses of the state legislature has violated both the state constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. From this premise he argues that no Colorado court is empowered to hear his petition; that the court in which he was convicted had no jurisdiction over him; and that the statute under which he was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. State v. Latham & YorkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  5. Legislative Reapportionment v. General AssemblySupreme Court of Colorado · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Hunt v. Warden, Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  3. Bhatti v. Fed. Hous. Fin. AgencyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
  4. Pueblo v. Ramos SantosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1995
  5. Sullivan v. Alabama State BarDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API