Hendrickson v. California Talc Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is an action to determine the interests of various parties in certain mining claims and to quiet their title thereto. On a former appeal, on the judgment roll alone, the judgment was reversed because of inconsistent findings and the cause was remanded for a new trial with respect to the ownership of Co-operation No. 1 mining claim. (Hendrickson v. California Talc Co., 35 Cal.App.2d 544 [96 P.2d 175].)
Thereafter the plaintiff and the cross-complainant filed amended pleadings each seeking to have it established that he was the owner of an undivided l/6th interest in that part of the land…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Wilbur v. United States Ex Rel. KrushnicSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Munson v. FishburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Capron v. Van HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Speed v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rickel v. Schwinn Bicycle Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Franco Western Oil Co. v. FarissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Webster v. KnopUtah Supreme Court · 1957
- Aaron v. PuccinelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Air Purification, Inc. v. CarleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.