Legal Opinion

Webster v. Knop

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1957No. 8577PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONOUGH, Chief Justice.

Defendants appeal from a judgment whereby, in a suit to quiet title, plaintiffs were decreed to be the owners of a Yz interest in certain mining claims.

On March 23, 1954, John J. Knop, one of the defendants and Lloyd F. Webster and Carl A. Webster, the plaintiffs in this action, entered into a written grubstake agreement whereby plaintiffs agreed to devote 50% of their time in prospecting for uranium or other valuable mineral claims including staking and recording of such; and defendant Knop agreed to furnish them with two vehicles and the necessary supplies not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peterson v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Speed v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Hendrickson v. California Talc Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Hollingsworth v. TuftsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ault v. HoldenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Moser v. Thorp Sales Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  3. City and County of Honolulu v. BennettHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Karl Horn and Lois Horn v. Robert B. Daniel and Le Roy BaconCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  5. Robert L. Preston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API