Legal Opinion

Constantin v. Smith

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided February 18, 1932No. 365PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHutcheson, Circuit Judge

(after stating the issues and facts as above)..

This suit, involving the exercise of the judicial power of the United States to restrain by injunction R. S. Sterling, W. W. Sterling, and Jacob F. Wollers, holding the offices respectively of Governor of the state of Texas, adjutant general, and brigadier general, from, under the claim of military necessity, limiting the production from plaintiffs’ wells in the East Texas oil field where the Governor has declared martial law, presents, in a fundamental way, questions of executive and judicial power.

The ease is one of wide interest and concern.…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Rowan & Nichols Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Jehovah's Witnesses in State of Wash. v. King County Hosp.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1967
  3. People's Petroleum Producers, Inc. v. SterlingDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1932
  4. Amazon Petroleum Corporation v. Railroad CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1934
  5. Cole v. Texas Army National Guard, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API