Jehovah's Witnesses in State of Wash. v. King County Hosp.
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
Before HAMLEY, Circuit Judge, and LINDBERG and BÉEKS, District Judges. PER CURIAM.
The Jehovah’s Witnesses, a minority religious group; the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania, legal governing agency for the Jehovah’s Witnesses; and individually-named Jehovah’s Witnesses, including minors as well as adults; have brought the above-entitled action on their own behalf and as a class action on behalf of all Jehovah’s Witnesses in the State of Washington. The prayer of the complaint asks that a special three-judge district court be convened pursuant to 28 U.S.C.…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Swift & Co. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Phillips v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Eichner v. DillonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Sohappy v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1969
- Custody of a MinorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Stefan Bucur v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Gabriela Rosus v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Gheorghe Dragos v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Hamilton v. NakaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.