In re the Estate of Rothfeld
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
The present appeal by the State Tax Commission from the pro forma order fixing the estate tax presents an interesting question of some general importance which, if the memoranda of both litigants are to be credited, has never previously been made the subject of direct adjudication. Unlike many other tax questions which have engaged the attention of the courts since the new law took effect in 1930 (Laws of 1930, chap. 710), only indirect light on the proper solution is obtainable from Federal decisions, since the particular provision, the meaning of which is here involved, namely,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Humes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Matter of ByrnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- In re HornidgeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
- In Re the Estate of WeidenNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- In re the Estate of ShupackNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Estate of FeldhusNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
- In re the Estate of DowlingNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948
- In re the Estate of FerraraNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Estate of AronsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
- In re the Estate of StrohNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.