Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Shupack
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided March 26, 1936PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
Almost, one hundred and ten years ago there was incorporated into the statutes of this State an enactment which read: “ When in consequence of a valid limitation of an expectant estate, there shall be a suspense of the power of alienation or of the ownership, during the continuance of which, the rents and profits shall be undisposed of, and no valid direction for their accumulation is given, such rents and profits shall belong to the persons presumptively entitled to the next eventual estate.” (R. S. pt. 2, chap. 1, tit. 2, § 40; 1 R. S. 726, § 40.)
Except for two wholly…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Manice v. . ManiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Schettler v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Cochrane v. . SchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Lopez v. MaesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- Rodak v. FuryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- In re the Estate of HilliardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
- In re GoodchildNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- Ungar v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.