Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Feldhus
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided November 23, 1937PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
The problem propounded concerns the interpretation of the third item of the will of this decedent which was admitted to probate on February 25, 1913. It reads: “ I give, devise and *123bequeath unto my beloved wife, Amalia D. Feldhus all the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, both real and personal of whatsoever nature or kind and wheresoever situated, to apply the rents, issues and profits therefrom toward her support and maintenance so long as she shall remain unmarried and my widow; but in case of her remarriage, then and in that case, she shall only receive one-third of my…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Humes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Alsens American Portland Cement Works v. Degnon Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Locke v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Hatch v. . BassettNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- In re MeekerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re the Estate of McGloneNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
- In re the Estate of FerraraNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Accounting of deVaronaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- In re the Estate of HeimNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Will of LambertNew York Surrogate's Court · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.