Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Aronson

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 5, 1957PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Joseph A. Cox, S.

The decedent died in December, 1953 leaving a will under which his widow is the sole beneficiary. The order fixing the New York estate tax allowed a maximum marital deduction of approximately $148,000 pursuant to paragraph (h) of subdivision 4 of section 249-s of the Tax Law. Included in the adjusted gross estate was insurance in excess of $100,000 but none of the insurance was required to fund the marital deduction. The executors contend that the estate is entitled to an insurance exemption of $100,000 under section 249-q of the Tax Law and because such exemption was not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. County of Herkimer v. Village of HerkimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  2. County of Herkimer v. Village of HerkimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. In re the Estate of FrancisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  4. In re the Estate of MeadNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  5. In re the Estate of RothfeldNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BarlowNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965
  2. In re the Estate of PhelanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1966
  3. In re the Estate of MandelbaumNew York Surrogate's Court · 1969
  4. In re the Estate of PionzioNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API