Legal Opinion
State v. Fry
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 30, 1988No. 2381PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Quillin, Judge.
Defendant, Roy D. Fry, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress a statement he made to the police. He claims a non-custodial right to counsel was violated. We find no such right and, therefore, affirm.
Wayne County Deputy Sheriff Timothy Brown went to defendant’s home on January 31, 1988 to investigate an accident that had involved defendant’s van. Defendant told Brown that someone named “Jerry” had been driving the van. In the course of the conversation, defendant indicated that he thought that he should talk to an attorney. The conversation continued and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. MiddletonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2007
- Silva v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BrantleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. MeyersOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. FrazierOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.