Legal Opinion
State v. Meyers
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 28, 2001No. Case Number 1-01-48PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Walters, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} Appellant, Paul D. Meyers, appeals a judgment of conviction and sentence entered by the Lima Municipal Court finding him guilty of operating a motor vehicle with a proscribed concentration of alcohol in his blood pursuant to R.C. 4511.19(A)(2). For the reasons expressed in the following opinion, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
{¶ 2} The facts that are relevant to the issue raised on appeal are as follows. At 2:03 a.m. on October 2,1998, Allen County Sheriff Deputy Brad Baty observed Paul D. Meyers, appellant, drive his motor vehicle into the path of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance v. ChristianOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. GonzalezOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. ClarkOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Turk v. OilerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- State v. BrandOhio Court of Appeals · 2004