Legal Opinion

N & G Construction, Inc. v. Lindley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1978No. 78-459PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole question to be decided in this cause is whether the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals, which determined that appellant was the 44severer” of natural resources within the meaning of R. C. 5749.01 (H) and 5749.02, was reasonable and lawful. R. C. 5717.04.

The General Assembly has imposed, through the enactment, of R. C. 5749.02. an excise tax on the privilege of engaging in the severance of natural resources situated in this state, such tax liability to be satisfied by the 4 4 severer.” 44Severer” is defined by the General Assembly as “any person who actually removes” the natural…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Posin v. A. B. C. Motor Court Hotel, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Gillum v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Canton v. Imperial Bowling Lanes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Gulf Oil Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Bond v. HarrelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hope Academy Broadway Campus v. White Hat Mgt., L.L.C. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Miles v. Perpetual Savings & Loan Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Prudential Insurance v. EslickDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1984
  4. United States v. Rapoca Energy Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1985
  5. Prime Kosher Foods, Inc. v. Administrator, Bureau of Employment ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API