Landolt v. Flame, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.
This is an action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when he went, through a glass door in a hasty exit from a bar after a fistic altercation. The primary negligence alleged :is that the glass exit door would not open “out” with “exit travel” in violation of the county building code.
Plaintiff appeals from an order setting aside a jury verdict of $6,098.75 and granting defendants’ alternative motion for a new trial “on all grounds set forth in the motion.” ① Those grounds may be summarized as follows:
1. Error in submitting to the jury the issue of building alterations in violation of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Frangos v. EdmundsOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Western Feed Co. v. HeidloffOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Harryman v. Roseburg Rural Fire Protection DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- ROHNER ET UX v. NevilleOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- McIntosh v. LawranceOregon Supreme Court · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Shoup v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2003
- Cole v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Scott v. MERCER STEEL CO., INC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Eduardo v. Clatsop Community Resource Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Snyder v. Hunter Room, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.