Legal Opinion

Landolt v. Flame, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1972PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when he went, through a glass door in a hasty exit from a bar after a fistic altercation. The primary negligence alleged :is that the glass exit door would not open “out” with “exit travel” in violation of the county building code.

Plaintiff appeals from an order setting aside a jury verdict of $6,098.75 and granting defendants’ alternative motion for a new trial “on all grounds set forth in the motion.” ① Those grounds may be summarized as follows:

1. Error in submitting to the jury the issue of building alterations in violation of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Frangos v. EdmundsOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Western Feed Co. v. HeidloffOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Harryman v. Roseburg Rural Fire Protection DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. ROHNER ET UX v. NevilleOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. McIntosh v. LawranceOregon Supreme Court · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Shoup v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Cole v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. Scott v. MERCER STEEL CO., INC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Eduardo v. Clatsop Community Resource Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Snyder v. Hunter Room, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API