Anderson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. 696
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Stephanie A. Ball, Fryberger, Buchanan, Smith & Frederick, P.A., Duluth, Minnesota (for appellants Paige Anderson, et al.)
W. Paul Otten, Otten Law Offices, Burnsville, Minnesota (for plaintiff intervenor State of Minnesota, Department of Human Services)
Timothy J. O'Connor, William L. Davidson, João C.J.G. de Medeiros, Thomas J. Evenson, Lind, Jensen, Sullivan & Peterson, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota (for respondents ISD 696, et al.)
Robert C. Barnes, McCarthy & Barnes, PLC, Duluth, Minnesota (for respondent Hailey Salo)
Considered and decided by Johnson, Presiding Judge; Ross, Judge; and Smith,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. AndaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Hall v. CORNETTOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald DriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.