Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. 696

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 11, 2019No. A18-0413Published

1Opinion of the Court

Stephanie A. Ball, Fryberger, Buchanan, Smith & Frederick, P.A., Duluth, Minnesota (for appellants Paige Anderson, et al.)

W. Paul Otten, Otten Law Offices, Burnsville, Minnesota (for plaintiff intervenor State of Minnesota, Department of Human Services)

Timothy J. O'Connor, William L. Davidson, João C.J.G. de Medeiros, Thomas J. Evenson, Lind, Jensen, Sullivan & Peterson, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota (for respondents ISD 696, et al.)

Robert C. Barnes, McCarthy & Barnes, PLC, Duluth, Minnesota (for respondent Hailey Salo)

Considered and decided by Johnson, Presiding Judge; Ross, Judge; and Smith,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. AndaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Hall v. CORNETTOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald DriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API