Legal Opinion
Baird v. Forbes State Bank
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 19, 1933No. File No. 6231PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChristianson, J.
This controversy arises in a proceeding to liquidate an insolvent bank and comes before this court for review under the provisions of Laws 1931, chapter 96, § 51 (e). It involves an order of the district court of Burleigh county authorizing the receiver of the Forbes State Bank to borrow moneys from the Reconstruction Finance Corporation with which to pay dividends to the creditors of the bank. Upon the hearing had in the trial court one Graham, a stockholder and creditor of the defendant bank, appeared and resisted the application of the receiver for authorization to borrow money from the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. First State Bank of JudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- Baird v. LeforNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- State ex rel. Sorensen v. Nebraska State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
- Blades v. Hood Ex Rel. Savings Bank & Trust Co. of Elizabeth CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Riches v. Hadlock, Bank Com'r.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- W. E. Daniel and E. A. Dillard v. The First National Bank of BirminghamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
- Smith v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Attorney General v. Union Guardian Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Devine v. CordovadoDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1954
- W. E. Daniel and E. A. Dillard v. The First National Bank of BirminghamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956