Legal Opinion

Krug v. Herod

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Erom the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, C. J.

In this action the appellee Mary P. Herod, the plaintiff below, alleged, in substance, in her complaint, that she was the owner, and entitled to the possession, of twenty-five fattening hogs, of the value of one hundred and fifty dollars, and of two fields of corn, ungathered, of about nineteen acres, of the value of one hundred and fifty dollars, of all which the appellant, William Krug, the defendant below, had possession without right, and unlawfully detained the same from the appellee, in Montgomery county; and that said property had not *79been taken by virtue of any tax, assessment or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ridenour v. BeekmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Baer v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1850

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Entsminger v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Louthain v. FitzerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Fruits v. ElmoreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Morgan v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Owens v. GaschoIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API