Legal Opinion
Gonzales v. Reynolds
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided February 18, 1929No. 3385PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WATSON, J.
By the judgment appealed from J. H.' Reynolds and Luis Rivera and wife were enjoined from carrying on, or conducting, a store or merchandise business upon certain described premises.
The facts as found by the trial court, and relied upon to support this judgment, may be stated as follows: The American Metals Company operated a mine employing some 200 persons, and with a large monthly pay roll. Aside from lands owned by this company, there was no other land except that of appellants Rivera offering a convenient location for a store to serve this community of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hodge v. . SloanNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Clark v. . DevoeNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Kramer v. . OldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Ladd v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Lewis v. . GollnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Davidson Bros. v. D. Katz & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Gonzales v. RiveraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
- Goldberg v. Tri-States Theatre CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Nichols v. AndersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
- Fogle v. ShahIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.