Legal Opinion

Fogle v. Shah

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 19, 1989No. 54A04-8807-CV-221PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONOVER, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants-sellers John and Karen Fogle (the Fogles) appeal the trial court's grant of permanent injunction in favor of defendants-appellees-buyers Asad A. Shah, Employee Benefit Consultants of America, Incorporated (EBC), Parveen Shah, Sheikh A. Rahman and Kathleen B. Ukstins (together, Shah) enforcing covenants not to compete ancillary to the sale of a business.

Affirmed.

The Fogles present two issues for our review. Restated they are:

1. whether the three year twelve state geographical restriction contained in paragraph 19(a) of the stock purchase agreement…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Donahue v. Permacel Tape Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Alexander & Alexander. Inc. v. DanahyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  3. Licocci v. Cardinal Associates, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Seach v. Richards, Dieterle & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. SHOPPERS'WORLD v. Board of Assessors of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dicen v. New Sesco, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Maids International, Inc. v. Ward (In Re Ward)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
  3. Smart Corp. v. GriderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Electrical Distributors, Inc. v. SFR, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. E.T. Products, LLC v. D.E. Miller Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API