Legal Opinion
Clarence Seay, Jr. v. Tennessee Valley Authority Craven Crowell
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 6, 2003No. 01-5953PublishedCited by 284 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Clarence Seay, Jr. appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment, on all counts of Plaintiffs amended complaint, in favor of Defendants Tennessee Valley Authority and Craven Crowell (collectively “TVA”). The lawsuit concerned certain adverse actions TVA took against Plaintiff which Plaintiff alleged constituted violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., and various other statutes and policies. Plaintiff contends that genuine issues of material fact remain for this case to proceed to trial, and that…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by284 opinions
- O'BRIEN v. Ed Donnelly Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Bonds v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Community Health Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- James Dixon, Jr. v. Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney General and Robert S. Mueller, Iii, Fbi DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Dawn White v. Columbus Metropolitan Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
279 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.