Legal Opinion

State v. Flannagan

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Erom the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

This was a prosecution upon information, against Harrison Elannagan, under section 66 of the misdemeanor act, 2 R. S. 1876, p. 479, for breaking down a toll-gate belonging to the Crawfordsville and' Eastern Turnpike Company.

Upon a trial by a jury,- a verdict of acquittal was returned and the defendant discharged.

The State has brought the cause to this court upon certain questions of law, reserved at the trial under section 119 of the criminal.code. 2 R. S. 1876, p. 405.

Harvey Solan testified on behalf of the State at the trial, as follows :

“ I have been, since the 1st day of December, 1878,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Selman v. WolfeTexas Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Gunter v. GearyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Harvey v. DewoodySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1856
  4. Burnham v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1841
  5. Earp v. LeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mayhew v. BurnsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Baumgartner v. HastyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Bidinger v. BishopIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Indiana Railway Co. v. CalvertIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Pyott v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API