Legal Opinion

Gunter v. Geary

California Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1851PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the superior court of the city of San Francisco. The facts of the case are fully stated in the subjoined opinions.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Bennett, J.

The plaintiffs, claiming to be the owners of a certain lot, in San Francisco, over which the tide ebbed and flowed, had driven piles over a portion of it, upon which they had built a small house. The defendants, supposing that the lot in question had been appropriated as a public slip, and that the piles and house were an obstruction to the free use thereof by the public, went on the lot and by force turned the plaintiffs out of possession and tore down their house. The action was brought to recover damages for such trespass.

On the 24th day of July, 1850, the city of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hart v. Mayor of AlbanyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1832
  2. Wetmore v. TracyNew York Supreme Court · 1835

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Teschemacher v. DavidsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. People v. Conagra Grocery Prods. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. Beaty v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Western Pac. Ry. Co. v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
  5. State v. FlannaganIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API