Legal Opinion

Penland v. Redwood Sanitary Sewer Service District

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 5, 1997No. 94-CV-0209; CA A90247PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Defendant Redwood Sanitary Sewer Service District (the District), a municipal corporation, appeals from a judgment in an action for nuisance, enjoining the District from continuing to operate a facility that converted human waste sludge into compost. The District argues, in part, that the trial court erred in determining that its actions were not shielded by “discretionary function” immunity under the Oregon Tort Claims Act (OTCA). ORS 30.265(3)(c). On de novo review, ORS 19.125(3), we conclude that the District’s actions are entitled to immunity, and reverse.

The District operates…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Hale v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. McBride v. MagnusonOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Urban Renewal Agency v. LackeyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. LEVENE ET UX. v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mark v. STATE, DEPT. OF FISH AND WILDLIFECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Penland v. Redwood Sanitary Sewer Service DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Penland v. Redwood Sanitary Sewer Service DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Mark v. STATE, DEPT. OF FISH AND WILDLIFECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API