Penland v. Redwood Sanitary Sewer Service District
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court, 327 Or 1, 956 P2d 964 (1998). In our original opinion, 146 Or App 225, 934 P2d 434 (1997), we held that, regardless of whether the defendant District’s operation of a composting facility constituted a nuisance, the operation was shielded by “discretionary function” immunity under the Oregon Tort Claims Act (OTCA), ORS 30.265(3)(c), and, thus, the trial court had erred in enjoining the facility’s operation. 146 Or App at 225-37. The Supreme Court reversed, concluding that discretionary function immunity under the OTCA “confers immunity…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thornburg v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Hay v. Oregon Department of TransportationOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- York Et Ux v. StallingsOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Swaggerty v. PetersenOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Lunda v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mark v. STATE, DEPT. OF FISH AND WILDLIFECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Hernandez v. Jefferson County Sheriff's OfficeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- Mark v. STATE, DEPT. OF FISH AND WILDLIFECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999