Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Blake

California Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1896No. S. F. No. 226PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. William T. Wallace, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.

Appeal from the judgment upon the judgment-roll, the sole question being whether the findings support the judgment.

The action is based upon a judgment obtained by one Latham against these defendants in another suit foreclosing a lien upon certain lands, and. directing a sale thereof in satisfaction of the lien—the object of the present action by the plaintiff, claiming as assignee of Latham, being to enforce said judgment by procuring a sale of the property therein directed to be sold. It was held on a former appeal herein that the action would lie, and that the complaint stated a cause of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Hunt v. LoucksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Perry v. QuackenbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Caruthers v. HensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. McAuliffe v. CoughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Buker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Hogan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. de Castro v. Junta de Comisionados de San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1942
  4. Clark v. NordholtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Agoure v. PeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API