Legal Opinion

Agoure v. Peck

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 2, 1912No. Civ. No. 1049PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Ventura County, and from an order denying a new trial. Frank R. Willis, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Hiatt & Selby, Geo. F. Hatton, H. F. Peart, and Orestes Orr, for Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.

The action is one brought by plaintiff against the treasurer of Ventura county, and upon his official bond. Judgment went for plaintiff, from which, and an order denying a new trial, defendants appeal.

The case is this: On the nineteenth day of March, 1907, an action was pending in the superior court of Ventura county, wherein Joseph F. Lewis was plaintiff and Pierre Agoure was defendant. On said date plaintiff in said action tendered to Agoure the sum of $1,000, conceded to be due him on account of the cancellation of a lease involved in said action, which sum Agoure refused to accept; and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hunt v. LoucksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Rowe v. BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hogan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. State Ex Rel. School District No. 4 v. McGrawMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Van Orden v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Michal v. AdairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Phipps v. WatsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API