Legal Opinion
Buker v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 7, 1972No. Civ. 11288PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COUGHLIN, J. *
Petitioners Harold W. Buker and Jon Wayne Vermouth, together with Phyllis Robinson and Charles F. Weisner, are named defendants in a four-count information charging them with possession of marijuana for sale, cultivating marijuana, possessing restricted dangerous drugs, and maintaining a place for selling marijuana. The charges against the four defendants followed search of a residence, under a search warrant, as a result of which the officers executing the warrant seized at least 42 different articles, including marijuana and $6,424 in currency. At the preliminary…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Neal v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Holton EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Grand Lake Drive In, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Gershenhorn v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Minsky v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. HollandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Coy v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- People v. FreenyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.