Legal Opinion

One Pacific Towers Homeowners' Ass'n v. HAL Real Estate Investments, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 4, 2001No. 46815-4-IPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

At issue in this case of first impression is whether a holding corporation, its subsidiaries, and others were “declarants” or “dealers” under the Washington Condominium Act1 for certain sales. If they were, the Condominium Act required that they provide their purchasers with public offering statements. We must also decide whether the trial court properly exercised its discretion in assessing attorney fees against the One Pacific Towers Homeowners’ Association and the plaintiff condominium purchasers (collectively, Owners) who brought this action.

Because the holding corporation and its…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Mains Farm Homeowners Ass'n v. WorthingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. Ralph Williams' North West Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. City of Seattle v. FontanillaWashington Supreme Court · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. One Pacific Towers Homeowners' Ass'n v. HAL Real Estate Investments, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. ONE PACIFIC TOWERS HOMEOWNERS'ASS'N v. HAL Real Estate Investments, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. Arlene's Flowers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Minton v. Ralston Purina Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Eagle Group, Inc. v. PullenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API