State v. Arlene's Flowers, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon McCLOUD, J.
*1209 ¶ 1 The United States Supreme Court has tasked us with deciding whether the Washington courts violated the United States Constitution's guaranty of religious neutrality in our prior adjudication of this case. We have fully reviewed the record with this issue in mind, and we have considered substantial new briefing devoted to this topic. We now hold that the answer to the Supreme Court's question is no: the adjudicatory bodies that considered this case did not act with religious animus when they ruled that the florist and her corporation violated the Washington Law Against Discrimination…
2Cases cited124 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Brush & Nib v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 2019
- Brush & Nib v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 2019
- California Expanded Metal Products Company v. James KleinDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- California Expanded Metal Products Company v. James KleinDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- Chelsey Nelson Photography LLC v. Louisville/Jefferson County Metro GovernmentDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.