Legal Opinion
In re the Welfare of the Child of E.A.C.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 21, 2012No. A11-1562PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Judge.
On appeal from the denial of a petition to return custody, appellant argues that (a) a challenge to a petition for return of custody under the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 U.S.C. §§ 1901-1963 (2006), requires application of all subsections of section 1912 to determine whether reunification is not in the child’s best interests, (b) the district court erred in concluding that remedial services provided to appellant five years ago satisfied ICWA’s requirement to demonstrate active efforts to provide appellant remedial services, and (c) the district court erred in determining…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'NSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Martinco v. HastingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Children, Youth & Families Dep't v. Keon H. (In Re Anhayla H.)New Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
- State Ex Rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Yodell B.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- State ex rel. CYFD v. Keon H.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
- Interest of K.B.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2021