Legal Opinion

State v. Hobbs

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 11, 1993No. 29672-8-I; 31052-6-IPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.

Appellant Martin Hobbs appeals his conviction of second degree assault with a deadly weapon, claiming (1) insufficient evidence to prove that the assault took place in King County, and (2) error by the trial court in modifying the "to convict" jury instruction after jury deliberations had begun. Finding actual prejudice in the belated modification of the instruction, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

Facts

1. Procedural Facts

Hobbs was charged by information on April 24,1991, with rape in the second degree, contrary to RCW 9A.44.050(l)(a) (count 1), and assault in the second degree with a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. PelkeyWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. MarinoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. HardamonWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State v. RansomCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  5. State v. WorlandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. HickmanWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. HickmanWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. CalvinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. State v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. HullCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API