Legal Opinion

State v. Ransom

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 24, 1990No. 12319-3-IIPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, J.

The important issue in Gregory Ransom's appeal from his conviction for unlawful possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver is whether the trial court erred by giving an instruction on accomplice liability in answer to a question from the jury after deliberations had begun. We reverse.

As to the facts, it will suffice to say that Ransom and another were arrested while Ransom was driving a pickup truck, that cocaine was found secreted in the truck, that both Ransom and his passenger were carrying large amounts of cash, and that a witness testified that earlier he had given the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. NgWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. DavenportWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Sams v. Commercial Standard InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. State v. MacMasterWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. StephansCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. CalvinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. State v. AguirreWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. AguirreWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. BecklinWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. BecklinWashington Supreme Court · 2008

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API