State v. Ransom
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, J.
The important issue in Gregory Ransom's appeal from his conviction for unlawful possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver is whether the trial court erred by giving an instruction on accomplice liability in answer to a question from the jury after deliberations had begun. We reverse.
As to the facts, it will suffice to say that Ransom and another were arrested while Ransom was driving a pickup truck, that cocaine was found secreted in the truck, that both Ransom and his passenger were carrying large amounts of cash, and that a witness testified that earlier he had given the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. NgWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. DavenportWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Sams v. Commercial Standard InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- State v. MacMasterWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. StephansCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. CalvinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State v. AguirreWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. AguirreWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. BecklinWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. BecklinWashington Supreme Court · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.