Legal Opinion

People v. Grundell

California Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1888No. 20359PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Hayne, C.

The appellant was convicted of grand larceny, and sentenced to one year in the state prison. Several points are made on the appeal.

*3021. A motion was made in the superior court to set aside the information on the ground that the committing magistrate had continued the hearing without an affidavit or the consent of the defendant, as provided by section 861 of the Penal Code. Without expressing any opinion as to whether this section is merely directory or not, it is sufficient to say that from the record before us it cannot be determined that the continuance was not by consent.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clark v. SawyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. People v. OilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. People v. ClevelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Reid v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. People v. CloonanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. RisenhooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. People v. LewandowskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. B.W.L. Sam v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  5. People v. BorenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API