Legal Opinion

Reid v. Reid

California Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1887No. 11789PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Hayne, C.

In order to contradict the defendant upon a material point, the plaintiff was permitted, against objection, to introduce the stenographer’s transcript of evidence given by the defendant in a different suit. This transcript, which does not appear from the record to have ever been filed, was certified by the stenographer “to be a true and correct transcription from my shorthand notes taken in the trial of said cause.” The stenographer was not examined as a witness, but the transcript was admitted on the faith of the certificate. The question is, whether the paper was legal evidence of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hicks v. LovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  3. Sill v. ReeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Lipscomb v. LyonNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  5. People v. Ah YuteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. SelbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. People v. McFarlaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. State v. MarrenIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Estate of BentonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Sampson v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API