Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Barefoot

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 30, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Adams, J.,

after stating tbe case: N. J. Lee was tbe only son of Julius A. Lee. While bis father was living be died intestate without lineal descendants, leaving sisters of tbe whole blood who, with tbe children of a deceased sister, are tbe original petitioners. Tbe intervening petitioners are collateral relations of tbe half-blood of N. J. Lee, being of tbe blood of bis mother but not of bis father, and in this capacity they claim an interest in tbe land in suit. Tbe trial court adjudged that they have no interest in tbe land and they excepted and appealed.

Tbe fourth canon of descent is in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Leaksville-Spray Institute v. MebaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Faust v. . FaustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Farmers Co-Operative Fertilizer Co. v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Harper v. . HarperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Grubb v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. Randle Ex Rel. Love v. GradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Gadsden v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Jones v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Harrelson v. . GoodenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API