Legal Opinion
de Antonio v. Solomon
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 30, 1967No. Civ. A. No. 65-679-GPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRITY, District Judge.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDERS ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO DEFAULT THE DEFENDANT
A brief recital of some of the history of this litigation is necessary to an understanding of this memorandum. Following Judge Caffrey’s denial of the defendant’s motion to dismiss, the defendant filed an “answer” which did not actually answer the allegations of the complaint but asserted the privilege against self-incrimination. The following day the plaintiff filed a motion to default the defendant on the ground that the answer failed to comply with the applicable Federal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- de Antonio v. SolomonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1966
3Cited by19 opinions
- National Acceptance Company of America v. Joseph S. Bathalter, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Choi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- C. Paul Rogers v. R. Howard WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Rashidi v. AlbrightDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1993
- In Re Caucus Distributors, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.