Legal Opinion
Cronus Investments, Inc. v. Concierge Services
California Supreme Court
Decided March 10, 2005No. S116288PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, J.
Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.2, subdivision (c) 1 permits a trial court, under specified circumstances, to stay arbitration pending the outcome of related litigation. In Volt Info. Sciences v. Leland Stanford Jr. U. (1989) 489 U.S. 468 [103 L.Ed.2d 488, 109 S.Ct. 1248] (Volt), the United States Supreme Court held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 United States Code section 1 et seq., which applies to and favors the enforcement of arbitration agreements affecting interstate commerce, does not preempt the application of section 1281.2, subdivision (c) where the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co.California Supreme Court · 2015
- Cox v. Ocean View Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.