Legal Opinion

Smith v. Neeley

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1924PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff, appellant here, brought suit upon a promissory note for $1,616.72, executed by defendants. As defenses the defendants alleged a material alteration in the note, and that the note was procured by fraud on the part of plaintiff; they also alleged the same fraud as the basis of a counterclaim in the sum of $2,135.16. The jury in answer to a special interrogatory found there had been no material alteration in the note, but rendered a general verdict for the defendants in the sum of $808.36, and judgment was entered thereon. Plaintiff moved for a new trial, which motion was denied, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sigafus v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Carpenter v. SibleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Gridley v. RossIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Frank v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Hines, Director Gen. R. R. v. PershinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Nelson v. ArmstrongIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Weitzel v. JukichIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  3. MacLeod v. StelleIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Smith v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Addy v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 1949

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API