Smith v. Neeley
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff, appellant here, brought suit upon a promissory note for $1,616.72, executed by defendants. As defenses the defendants alleged a material alteration in the note, and that the note was procured by fraud on the part of plaintiff; they also alleged the same fraud as the basis of a counterclaim in the sum of $2,135.16. The jury in answer to a special interrogatory found there had been no material alteration in the note, but rendered a general verdict for the defendants in the sum of $808.36, and judgment was entered thereon. Plaintiff moved for a new trial, which motion was denied, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sigafus v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Carpenter v. SibleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Gridley v. RossIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
- Frank v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
- Hines, Director Gen. R. R. v. PershinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Nelson v. ArmstrongIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Weitzel v. JukichIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
- MacLeod v. StelleIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Smith v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Addy v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.