Legal Opinion

D'AGOSTINO v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1995No. B090879PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALDRICH, J.—

Introduction

Petitioner Lea Purwin D’Agostino (petitioner) seeks a writ of mandate which would command real party in interest, the Los Angeles City Clerk, Elias Martinez (City Clerk), to place D’Agostino’s name on the ballot for the special election of a member of the city council for the fifth council district, which is set for April 11, 1995, on the ground that she has substantially complied with the provisions of the city charter and the Elections Code, or, in the alternative, to allow her to submit additional signatures to qualify. Petitioner’s name was not put on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Assembly v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Stasher v. Harger-HaldemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. California Teachers Assn. v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Atkinson v. LorbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Truman v. RoyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Robertson v. Health Net of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API