Legal Opinion

Segerstrom v. Holland Piano Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 27, 1924No. 23,987PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

This is an action upon an account stated. The amount is for dividends declared by defendant on its stock on June 30, 1919, March 20, 1920, and July 20, 1920, and on those dates credited *97and paid to the several stockholders, except plaintiff, although she owned 61.91 shares of stock during this time. Trouble between these parties is of long standing. Segerstrom v. Holland Piano Mnfg. Co. 142 Minn. 104, 170 N. W. 930 (same title again 155 Minn. 50, 192 N. W. 191). The facts as they appear in these two prior cases have some bearing here. In the last case plaintiff recovered cash and stock…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. Northwestern Sleigh Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1889
  2. State ex rel. Engelhard v. WeberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. McLaran v. Crescent Planing Mill Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Sheets v. RamerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Stoddard v. Shetucket Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1868

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wessin v. Archives Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. McGrath v. Northwestern Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Western Gravel Co. v. M. J. Nolan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Bronzin Holding Co. v. McGeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. W. E. Caldwell Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API