Legal Opinion

Western Gravel Co. v. M. J. Nolan Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 20, 1928No. 26,641PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Appeal from a judgment entered after the defendant’s amended answer (herein referred to as the answer) was stricken.

The complaint seeks to recover $3,250 on an account stated. The answer denies indebtedness to plaintiff in the sum of $3,250 and denies that there was an account stated between the parties. The answer says that at plaintiff’s request defendant gave to plaintiff an order in the form of an assignment on the Wisconsin highway department for $3,250, the purpose of which was to aid plaintiff in keeping its credit with its bank; that plaintiff fraudulently procured the order by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bank of Richards v. SheasgreenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  2. Bronzin Holding Co. v. McGeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Segerstrom v. Holland Piano Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. O'Donnell v. LesselyoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. Knudson v. PedersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Meagher v. KavliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. McGrath v. Northwestern Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Zinsmaster Baking Co. v. Commander Milling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FalkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Hall-Vesole Co. v. Durkee-Atwood Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API