Legal Opinion

State v. Dill

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 16, 1994No. 62985; CA A76056PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*8DEITS, P. J.

Defendant was charged with driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). ORS 813.010. The state appeals the trial court’s order suppressing defendant’s responses to questions asked after the completion of field sobriety tests. We reverse and remand.

During a lawful traffic stop, Officer Wilcox reasonably suspected that defendant had committed the offense of DUII. After advising defendant that their conversation was being recorded, she informed him of his Miranda rights and requested that he perform certain field sobriety tests. She told him the specific field sobriety tests…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State v. SchafferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HayesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. State v. PrickettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. State v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Christensen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. DillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API