Christensen v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VOIGT, Justice.
[¶1] In this appeal, Rodney Gene Christensen (Christensen) claims that the State breached a plea agreement that would have allowed him to enter the Wyoming Substance Abuse Treatment & Recovery Centers (WyS-TAR) before being sentenced. Finding that Christensen failed to show plain error, we will affirm.
ISSUE
[T2] Did plain error occur in the form of the State breaching its plea agreement with Christensen?
FACTS
[¶3] On July 7, 2008, Christensen was charged with nine counts of burglary and seven counts of larceny. On July 24, 2008, he entered into a plea agreement with the State…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rutti v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Frederick v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Browning v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Ford v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Hannifan v. American National Bank of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gilbert Ortiz, Jr. v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- Marquess v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- Clifford Giles Springstead v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Mercer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Tirso Munguia v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2025