Legal Opinion

State v. Lawrence

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 9, 1992No. 903896; CA A70304PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). ORS 813.010. He contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress the results of field sobriety tests and his responses to questions that the arresting officer asked after the officer stopped the tests. We reverse and remand.

Defendant was stopped for committing various traffic violations. When Officer Shawver approached defendant, he observed indicia of intoxication. He asked defendant to perform field sobriety tests and advised him that test failure or refusal to perform the tests…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Illinois v. AndreasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. PrickettOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. NielsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. State v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State v. PrickettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. State v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API