State Ex Rel. Weiss v. Moriarty
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Mandamus to require the Honorable Joseph J. Moriarty, judge of the eighth judicial district, to amend an order granting a new trial by specifying the grounds therefor.
Petitioner is a defendant in an action brought by the administrator of the estate of Carl Gehrke before the late Judge Tifft. At the close of the evidence petitioner moved for a directed verdict on the ground that it conclusively appeared that the matter in issue was governed by the workmen’s compensation act. The motion was granted and the proceedings stayed until a transcript of the record could be delivered by the reporter to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Matter of the N.Y. Cen. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Parker v. FrybergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Levine v. Barrett & BarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Cash v. KruschkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Fatt v. FattWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Eysink v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Ginsberg v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Weckerling v. McNiven Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Smith v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- The Jesmer Co. v. Wurdemann-Hjelm Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.