Mastronardi v. Infante
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The defendants1 appeal from the judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, Gerardo Mastronardi and Angela Mastronardi. Following a trial before an attorney state trial referee; see General Statutes § 52-434 (a) (4); Practice Book § 428 et seq.; the trial court accepted the referee’s reported findings determining the boundaries of a certain easement, and rendered judgment. On appeal, the defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) sustained the referee’s findings of fact, and (2) sustained the conclusions based on those findings. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Beizer v. GoepfertConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Lake Garda Improvement Assn. v. BattistoniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- American Trading Real Estate Properties, Inc. v. Town of TrumbullSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Oak Leaf Marina, Inc. v. ErtelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Castonguay v. PlourdeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Gallo-Mure v. TomchikConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Kallas v. HarnenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Cadle Co. v. GinsburgConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Friedman v. Town of WestportConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.