Legal Opinion

Doe v. Doe

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2010No. 36760PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUBMITTED ON THE BRIEFS

BURDICK, Justice.

John Doe I (hereinafter Doe) appeals from the magistrate court’s Memorandum Decision and Order terminating his parental rights to his child, D.C., entered September 21, 2009. 1 We affirm.

I.FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

D.C. was born in 1999. On April 4, 2000, a child protection referral was made in Moscow, Idaho, regarding the care of D.C. According to the reporting party, Doe and D.C.’s mother (Mother) had taken D.C. to a babysitter’s house and did not follow through with plans to pick up D.C., leaving the babysitter with no supplies, such as milk,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Doe v. Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Folks v. Moscow School District No. 281Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Welch v. Cowles Publishing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  3. In re the Termination of the Parental Rights of DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. In Re DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  5. In Re DoeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API