Legal Opinion

Doe v. Department of Health & Welfare

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 2009No. 35637PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

This appeal arises from a magistrate judge’s order granting the petition of Respondent Department of Health & Welfare (the Department) to terminate the parent-child relationship between Appellants John Doe and Jane Doe and their child, I.P. This is an expedited appeal directly from that order. We conclude that the record contains substantial and competent evidence supporting the trial court’s findings of abandonment and we therefore affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

I.P. was born on July 19, 2005, and Appellants are her biological parents. On July 25, 2006, John Doe’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Doe v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Tanner v. State, Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Doe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. In Re DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare v. Doe (In Re Interest of Doe)Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Doe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2010

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API